Blog

  • Cartoonishly Sublime, or Sublimely Cartoonish?

    Local cartoonist and comedian Brett Hamil typically produces comics in two styles. First, he’s a gag strip artist: Hamil has a pair of comic strips in local media, one dealing with parenthood issues and one satirizing local politics. And second, he has published a series of clever, inventive slice-of-life comics that are typically quieter, more contemplative, and wide-ranging than his other work.

    My favorite Hamil comic is in the second register. It’s called Bald Knob, and it’s a series about being aimless and young and wary of anything resembling potential. It’s one of my favorite graphic novels of the last ten years and I think that the primary reason that Hamil doesn’t get the attention he deserves is because he illustrates all of his comics in the same style—a cartoonish simplicity.

    I think if Bald Knob was illustrated in the style of, say, Adrian Tomine, it would be published by one of the major graphic novel presses. But nobody knows what to do with books that are drawn in a funny style that touch on serious topics. For myself, I love the juxtaposition. The only thing better than taking a dumb joke very seriously in my estimation is approaching serious topics with a sense of humor.

    Anyway, Hamil has a new book out, and it’s in the second register, though it’s also pretty funny. It’s a collection of three short stories called Front End Loader, and it’s about secrets and religious experiences and what happens when a mundane life bumps up against the unexplained. If you’re intrigued by what I wrote about Hamil above, this is probably the best introduction to his experimental, literary side. My favorite story is the second one in the book, a tiny absurdist sex farce with a great punchline. But all three of them are worth your time and attention, if you like a little comedy in your pathos (or vice versa).

  • Don’t Forget How Hard It Was

    Image from Joe Alterio’s website.

    During the early days of pandemic lockdowns, I interviewed a librarian who was trying to find fiction set during the 1918 pandemic that was published shortly after the pandemic. He said that basically there was almost no contemporaneous fiction written about the Spanish flu or its impacts on society. Once that pandemic had passed, it was almost as though everyone just silently agreed to move on and forget what had happened, he said.

    That’s happening now with Covid. You can feel institutions and individuals shoving the experience of the pandemic and lockdowns down the memory hole. Politicians want us to forget that government quickly acted to effectively get money into the hands of people who needed it, employers want us to forget that many people could easily work from home, society in general wants low-wage workers to forget that they were ever termed “essential.” Masking and free vaccinations and everything else is swirling down the drain of our collective memory.

    As for me, I love reading about how the pandemic and pandemic-era lockdowns impacted people. In particular, I was a daily reader of Roger Langridge’s excellent five-year diary comic experiment, which overlapped with Covid. And now I’m a big fan of Seattle cartoonist Joe Alterio’s Covid diary comics, It’s Never Easy.

    The book is beautiful, printed using a three-color risograph press that makes the colors on each strip look hand-applied. The comics are deeply observational, as though we’re seeing out of Alterio’s eyes. And because everyone is busy staying six feet apart from everyone else, there aren’t a whole lot of people to fix our gaze upon. A limp flag, a roof pelted by rain, a flight of stairs with no one on them. Each three-panel strip feels like a complete thought, a moment.

    These comics put me back in the days of lockdowns, and I mean that in the most pleasant way possible—the silence, the contemplation, the sense that something important had changed forever. The fear and loneliness is there, too, and that’s important. Alterio captures all that nuance—the quietness and the way some things felt amplified to the point of incomprehension.

    This is a book I can pull out to bring me back to those weird, unique days. While everyone is so desperate to pretend that the pandemic never happened, I’m glad to have this gorgeous book to remind me that not only did it happen—it mattered.

  • This One’s a Charmer

    The Poet Empress by Seattle area author Shen Tao is not the kind of book that I traditionally read. Fantasy, particularly fantasy involving royal families, is really not my bag. I don’t like stories about destiny and preserving bloodlines and other determinative nonsense. But the book came highly recommended by Lost the Plot mobile bookshop, and so I gave it a try, and I’m glad I did. The closest comparison to a book that I can find for this one is The Hunger Games, in terms of a likable protagonist thrown into a life-or-death system that she doesn’t fully understand.

    Tao’s world building is at once expansive and restrained: We’re not bored to death with acres of lore before the story starts. Instead, we’re thrown in and Tao parcels information as it’s needed as the narrative unfolds. Our impoverished hero unwillingly becomes the concubine to a sociopathic prince who can magically control knives, and she must find a way to survive and to provide for her family.

    After I tore through the first two hundred pages, The Poet Empress slowed down a bit for me as the story began to follow some well-trod paths. But I’m eager to read whatever Tao writes next—if she can inspire me to eagerly read a fantasy novel, she can do just about anything.

  • Not Directed By Judd Apatow, Thank God

    In another universe, Olivia Wilde’s latest movie, The Invite, could have been a standard Seth Rogen comedy. The premise, about a weary middle-aged married couple (Rogen and Wilde) inviting a more sexually adventurous couple (Edward Norton and Penelope Cruz) over for dinner, seems custom-made for Obama-era Apatovian nonsense.

    But I’m glad to live in the universe where The Invite desperately upends any attempts to turn into a Seth Rogen comedy. Rogen is just as funny as he always is, and he plays a familiar kind of washed-up schlub. But the rhythms of the movie resist the kind of easy comedy where Rogen seems like the hero. Instead, people are horrified by his comedic barbs. They’re annoyed by his eagerness to always have a snappy comeback. It’s like he wandered into a horror movie by accident and he’s too far into the character to notice that his usual charm isn’t working. For much of The Invite, he’s kind of the villain.

    This isn’t a one-man show. In fact, it’s a pretty evenly distributed four-hander. Cruz is doing exceptional, careful work with a character who could easily be a stereotype. Norton gives dignity to his buffoonish character, and Wilde is as good as she’s ever been, both in front of and behind the camera. Because it all takes place in one apartment, the script, from Rashida Jones and Will McCormack based on a 2020 Spanish film, could practically be a Broadway sex farce.

    The Invite has a lot to say about marriage and sacrifice and friendship, and there’s a good chance that if you’re in a shaky marriage you might find yourself relating closely to one of the four characters. (I’ve learned way too much about the troubled relationships of some of my favorite film critics from reviews of this movie.) But none of those themes were nearly as interesting to me as the acting. The pleasure of watching four veterans from four very different backgrounds come together, with all their histories and expectations, and making something completely unlike anything they’ve ever done before is unparalleled. I was all in on this one.

    (If you live in Seattle, you should go see The Invite at Tasveer Film Center because it’s becoming a great place to see movies!)

  • What’s Burgundy, Carries 500 Books and Is Street Legal?

    (Hailey Woods Photography)

    For my monthly Neighborhood Reads piece in the Seattle Times, I interviewed Ash Hoffman, the owner of Lost the Plot, a mobile bookstore that sells books all the way from Everett to Tacoma. It’s a gorgeous little bookstore, and Hoffman is building a devoted following of book-lovers across the Puget Sound region. Hoffman can adjust her store’s inventory to better match her audience’s tastes, and you’ll have to read the piece to find out which genres sell best in Tacoma, Edmonds, and Ballard. (And I love that she named the van Plotsy.)

  • On a Binary Scale, This One Is a Zero

    Before Michael Crichton was Michael Crichton, he wrote an entire shelf’s worth of thrillers under the pseudonym John Lange. Over a dozen years ago, the folks at Hard Case Crime resurrected the Lange library and republished it for the first time under Crichton’s own name.

    For the weekend of July 4th, I brought one of those Lange thrillers, Binary, with me to an undisclosed quiet location where my dogs would not be terrified by nonstop fireworks. (The book is now published by Blackstone, though I prefer the sleazy Hard Case cover on the edition I read a lot more than the generic cover of the latest edition.)

    I had hoped the book would be trashy fun to distract me on a noisy holiday weekend. Instead, Binary is maybe the most generic thriller I’ve ever read. It’s about a boring good guy trying to catch a boring criminal before he kills thousands or hundreds of thousands or millions of people. Aside from a compelling first chapter featuring a clever idea for a heist, it’s all so rote that it might as well have come in a black and white cover under the title Generic Crime Thriller.

    Nothing was upsetting about this book, and I never felt compelled to abandon it. It’s a fast read and never boring. But I can’t really recommend it, unless you’re interested in writing thrillers and you want a very early and very flawed example of a thriller written by a master of the form before he knew what he was doing.

  • Motherfucker, You ARE the Mainstream

    I was just on NPR’s website for an unimportant reason and I encountered this remarkable artifact of the media in the year 2026:

    Screenshot

    Bear with me, please, because I want to describe what is in this screenshot that I grabbed: First, it says “Popular on NPR.org.” Then, there’s a picture of an old white guy with a white beard looking like he’s mansplaining to a woman who we can barely see. He’s speaking into a microphone with the NPR logo on it. The photo is emblazoned with an “NPR Newsmakers” bug, again with the logo, in the lower right corner. Underneath the photo and directly under the bug, is a headline that says “NPR’S NEWSMAKERS,” followed by the actual title of the story: “The pastor who wants to repeal voting right for women is becoming more mainstream.”

    That “is becoming” is doing an awful lot of work, because NPR is very clearly implicating itself, within the photo and in all the text surrounding the photo, as one of the major forces that are mainstreaming the pastor who wants to repeal voting rights.

    One of the most important jobs in a major news organization is to decide what you don’t cover. Not every idea is worth coverage. And at the top of the list of ideas that are not worth coverage is the idea that any human being is unworthy of personhood. We do not debate people’s fundamental rights as human beings or question their humanity. Ever. Why? Because that’s Nazi shit. Period.

    Obviously, reporters do not endorse every idea they quote or report on in the course of their work. But when you are platforming a bigot in a photo with repeated instances of your logo and you’re billing him as one of your “newsmakers” and writing about him “becoming more mainstream,” you are complicit in that bigotry. You’re not just an objective observer. You are giving him a platform that he does not deserve.

    You might say, “oh, but the story is marked as ‘Popular,’ so clearly there’s an audience for it.”

    To that I respond, “Bullshit.” Just because people like to stare at awful shit doesn’t mean you’re required to post gruesome photographs of car accidents. There is no reason—zero—to platform this hateful man and his bigoted, ugly ideas. This is a disgrace that reflects poorly on every reporter at NPR.

  • The Urbanist In My Ear

    One of my all-time favorite audiobook experiences was the fall when I was listening to Jane Jacobs’s urbanist classic The Death and Life of Great American Cities while walking around Seattle. Very often, the audiobook would describe something I was looking directly at on my walk, and it began to feel like an audio tour of Seattle’s best and worst urban planning.

    In his book 20 Minutes in Manhattan, Michael Sorkin brings up Jacobs’s book very often—to the point that it feels a little bit like meeting someone who also took a class taught by your favorite teacher. Sorkin is deeply informed by Jacobs and he applies her thoughts on urban planning and public spaces throughout this book.

    I borrowed 20 Minutes in Manhattan from the Seattle Public Library as soon as I heard the premise: The book supposedly examines New York City’s urban design through the lens of Sorkin’s 20-minute walking commute through Manhattan from his home to his office. The premise of a blend of Jane Jacobs and Nicholson Baker’s miniaturist masterpiece The Mezzanine was instantly compelling to me.

    Unfortunately, the book doesn’t adhere to the premise as strictly as I would like. There are plenty of Baker-like digressions on elevator codes and other forces that shape city life, but the book is instead just organized in a series of essays, using the titular commute as a way to collect and shape the argument.

    Sorkin has a lot to say, and he’s a fount of knowledge about the way cities are put together, but there was no narrative thread that pulled me through this one—instead, by the end, I was ready to be done with the book. Still, my biggest regret about 20 Minutes in Manhattan is that there doesn’t seem to be an audiobook version. I would have loved to take this book with me on my commute and engage with it in conversation about the similarities and differences we find in our two very different cities.

  • Sue Me, I Liked The Bear

    Rarely has a television show fallen in the public’s estimation over the course of five seasons like The Bear. Like everyone else, I enjoyed the first season a lot and was blown away by the second season, which I’m pretty sure stands as one of my all-time favorite TV seasons. And like everyone else, I was annoyed by the drawn-out third season and underwhelmed by the wheel-spinning fourth season.

    I’m not someone with abundant patience for TV. If I get bored, I jump off pretty quickly. I left Stranger Things after the start of the second season and never looked back, for instance. But no matter how self-referential and thinly paced The Bear got, I never stopped loving those characters—particularly Cousin Richie, played by Ebon Moss-Bachrach. These are characters, and actors, I would follow anywhere.

    So I was thrilled to discover that the fifth and final season of The Bear is good. Seven episodes track the restaurant staff over the course of a single night, and this is the rare case where I’d encourage viewers to binge as many of those first seven episodes as is possible in a single evening. I almost wish the fifth season came in the form of a movie, because the gravity of that one night is so powerful that it weakens a bit when it comes time to end one episode and start another. The eighth and final episode is a different tone entirely and can be watched separately, maybe the night after a binge.

    Folks online have their gripes about season five, but I think the creators landed the plane. Every one of the characters changed in a meaningful way, the themes of the series were wrapped up neatly, and there was enough ambiguity baked into some of the ending to give fans room to impose their own hopes and dreams onto the story.

    Do I have quibbles? Yes, definitely. But was I swooning over watching a group of charming, competent people solve problems in a fast-paced, stressful environment? Absolutely. After a couple of seasons in the wilderness, I think The Bear came home to achieve exactly what it needed to do.

  • Here’s My June 2026 Playlist

    When it comes to my taste in music, novelty is important. I can’t listen to the same 500 classic rock songs every single day. I like to hear new sounds, track new trends, find new artists.

    Every month, I start a new playlist. Then, every time I hear a new song that I like, I add it to the playlist. They usually wind up being a couple of albums long. I thought I would start sharing those playlists here with you.

    But first, a couple of caveats: These songs are dumped into the playlist in strict chronological order in terms of when I discover them. That is to say, I have not arranged them into a mix and the transitions are not maximized for pleasant listening. In fact, the song-to-song shifts are often a little jarring. And I only add songs that are new to me, which means they’re not all brand-new music.

    I don’t claim to be a musical expert. I like short, catchy, poppy songs and I’ve learned that I’m more likely to love a song if it features swearing, so don’t play the playlist with the kids in the car, okay?

    I prefer Apple Music, so that’s what I’ve got to share. If you use another streaming service and you use Apple devices, I can’t recommend the app Playlisty enough. For a one-time fee, you can easily transport playlists from one streaming service to another. I use it all the time.

    Anyway, this June’s music wasn’t as summer-y as I’d hoped it would be. The playlist starts pretty soft and contemplative (deBasement aside) before things get a little more lively and poppy. I’d say my favorite barbecue bangers are “This Feeling” by The Allergies, the delightful “Pop Pop” by Channel Tres, and especially “Yip Yip Yow” by Caroline Rose. There’s a nice little danceable stretch in the middle, too, if you’re into that kind of thing.

    It doesn’t seem like WordPress plays nicely with Apple Music, so here’s a link to the playlist, instead. Let me know what you think!