I can’t recall the last time a blurb inspired me to read a book that I wasn’t already going to read. Blurb culture has gotten so safe and inoffensive that blurbs are basically white noise—some distracting lines on book covers that might, if you squint, give you some idea where the author went to university.
I was already going to read Stephen Graham Jones’s historical vampire novel The Buffalo Hunter Hunter, but the one blurb on the cover of the book actually caught my eye. It was only three words and a website attribution:
“Horror’s Moby Dick.”
—Vulture
How the hell can you ignore that blurb? That’s a gigantic promise, right there. And the book has received enough raves that the blurb seemed credible—it might not just be rampant hyperbole. Buffalo Hunter Hunter was, the cover of the paperback edition helpfully informs us, a New York Times Notable Book of 2025, and the first page informs us it was also near the top of the list for honors as varied as the Bram Stoker Award, the Nebula Award, the LA Times Book Prize, and Barack Obama’s summer reading list. So maybe this centuries-spanning story of an undead wanderer seeking justice for a Blackfeet Indian massacre actually was Melville’s second coming?
Friends, that blurb stuck in my head so badly that it actively worsened my reading experience. The whole time I was reading, I wondered, “is this passage what that reviewer thought was Moby Dick-esque? What’s so Mellvillian about this?”
This is a silly complaint to hold against such an impressive book. I thought The Buffalo Hunter Hunter had a lot to say about American history, about the treatment of indigenous peoples, about wars and tragedies and how we collectively move on from tragedies and wars. The book was full of clever touches and compelling characters. While the story never completely won over my heart, I was impressed by nearly every aspect of storytelling.
But every time I opened or closed the book, I had that telltale blurb staring me in the face and I just couldn’t shake it.
What were they thinking? Did the blurber ever even read Moby Dick, or is it just their generic stand-in for a Big Important Book? There’s no way to tell. I can’t find any review or roundup or interview that includes those words on Vulture. Searching Vulture’s archive for “Horror’s Moby Dick” or “Buffalo Hunter Hunter” brings back zero results.
Who wrote the goddamned blurb? What did they mean when they wrote it? I guess we’ll never know. But wherever they came from, I hope whoever first wrote the words “Horror’s Moby Dick” in reference to The Buffalo Hunter Hunter will understand that I hate them for tainting my reading experience so badly that I will never be able to even look at that book again without thinking of their goddamned alluring, misleading, distracting blurb.






